Background checks from the Times???

That is the height of hypocrisy! Why don't they start off by doing background checks on their OWN reporters???

(Anyone remember Jayson Blair?)

It's incredibly obvious to anyone not wearing blinders that the Times is one of the most biased newspapers in this country. People who still read the Times are apparently doing it for entertainment purposes or because they're willfully ignorant, or maybe just afraid of those funny little things we on the Right like to call "facts."

But this background check into the adoption records is just about as low as they can get. Let's hope their subscription dwindles so far (as it's on track to...) that they're forced to declare bankruptcy. Then maybe Rupert Murdoch can buy them and straighten them out...